A former DUP councillor was jailed today (Monday) for historic sexual offences committed against a young girl.
The offences carried out by William Ball - which he initially denied and branded as “total lies” and “a good story” when questioned by the PSNI - date back to the late 70s and early 80s.
From Richardson Court in Belfast, the 72-year old had a 15-month sentence imposed by Judge Laura Ievers KC.
The former politician served on Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council until 2018 when he quit his position.
Today’s sentencing at Belfast Crown Court marks the second time Ball has appeared in court for sexual offending.
In July 2021 he was handed a combination order consisting of 80 hours community service and a three-year Probation Order for separate similar sexual offences committed against three teenage girls between April 1977 and June 1991.
He was back in court today where it emerged offending against a fourth girl occurred when she was aged between 12 and 15 and Ball was aged between 24 and 27.
She recalled that as a young girl, she witnessed Ball standing at his living room window with his lower clothing pulled down and his penis exposed. This behaviour occurred on more than one occasion.
She didn’t tell her parents about this at the time and has since expressed regrets for not speaking up as she feels it may have prevented a subsequent incident.
When she was aged around 14, she was alone in his company and he indecently assaulted her.
Due to Ball’s status in the community, she felt she wouldn’t be believed and she didn’t report this incident of sexual abuse at the time.
After making disclosures to a counsellor in February 2019, the victim contacted the PSNI to make a former complainant in January 2021 and the following May an interview was conducted with her.
Ball was interviewed in May 2023 when he denied any wrongdoing.
When her allegations of exposing himself was put to him, he denied this and said it was a “good story” and her account of the indecent assault was “total lies.”
He continued these denials until the morning his trial was due to commence on October 20 this year.
Before the jury was sworn, he pleaded guilty to charges of indecently assaulting a female on an unknown date between April 9, 1980 and April 19, 1981 and indecently exposing himself to her on an unknown date between April 9, 1978 and April 10, 1980.
Judge Ievers noted that the victim attended court in October and was due to give evidence which, following Ball’s admissions, she was not required to do.
The Judge said the victim, who also attended today’s sentencing, had been “vindicated by dint of the defendant’s public acknowledgement that he is responsible for offending against her”.
Saying Ball’s offending has had a “significant impact” upon her, Judge Ievers said she had reading a “moving” statement which set out the trauma she experienced both at the time and in the intervening years.
This includes the physical and psychological harm she has suffered and how her Christian faith has been affected.
In her statement, the victim said: “I carry a profound sadness that my happy, safe and innocent childhood was violated by him.
“Reporting and bringing this to court has been a traumatic experience but important for me in processing the damage caused in my past by the defendant and for me to be able to move forward in a positive way in the future.”
Defence barrister Noel Dillon told Judge Ievers that following his last sentencing, Ball completed his community service and engaged with Probation.
Mr Dillon also revealed that Ball now finds himself with “relationship difficulties with his family who no longer want to know him” and is seeking a move from his current address due to “protests”.
The defence barrister also outlined Ball’s ill health which resulted in a recent spell in hospital.
Ball, Mr Dillon said, has also acknowledged the impact his offending has had on his victim with him telling a Probation Officer his actions were “evil and nasty.”
Ball also told Probation that whilst he couldn’t remember the offending, he accepted responsibility and hates himself for it.
Branding sexual offending against children as “abhorrent”, Judge Ievers told Ball “you prioritised your sexual gratification over your victim’s needs.”
Adding that the case “clearly passes the custodial threshold””, Judge Ievers imposed the 15-month sentence upon the pensioner.
He was also placed on the Sexual Offenders Register for ten years and a five-year restraining order was imposed which bans Ball from contacting the victim.
Judge Ievers then addressed prison staff, told them “Mr Ball can be taken down” and following this he was led from the dock and into custody.
Ends
MMMM
